You find out from someone outside the company
A journalist, a client, or the CEO's WhatsApp. By then the narrative has formed and you are responding to a story rather than shaping one.
Consumer & Retail
FMCG & Personal CareAyurveda & WellnessFood & BeverageDairy & Ice CreamBeauty & CosmeticsFashion & ApparelJewellery & GoldCommerce & Technology
E-commerce & D2CFood Delivery & Quick CommerceConsumer Tech & AppsSaaS & Enterprise TechTelecomHealth, Education & Media
Healthcare & HospitalsPharma & Life SciencesEdTech & EducationMedia & EntertainmentVelocity measured against your own baseline, severity that escalates only when a second signal agrees, and a brief that separates what is confirmed from what isn't, with a holding statement drafted from the facts, not a blank page.
A journalist, a client, or the CEO's WhatsApp. By then the narrative has formed and you are responding to a story rather than shaping one.
A flat threshold fires constantly on a busy brand and never on a quiet one. Within a month nobody reads them, which is worse than having none.
Everyone is in a room asking what is actually confirmed. That hour is the most valuable one you have, and it gets spent on admin.
An alert that fires on everything is the same as an alert that fires on nothing. Escalation has to mean something.
By the time it reaches a journalist it is a story. Everything that matters happens in the window before that.
A customer posts a photo with your hashtag. On its own this is noise, hundreds a week look like this.
Five first-time posters, one regional news account, one complaint aggregator. That mix matters far more than the count.
Your hashtag starts co-occurring with a safety tag. The co-occurrence, not the volume, is the first honest sign this is one issue.
38 posts against a normal 12 an hour. Because every row is a real post, this is a real spike.
Social alone doesn't earn a critical. The severity reflects the evidence, which is what keeps the alert worth reading.
Known and unknown separated, and a holding statement drafted from those facts in the language the story broke in.
Press volume crosses its own baseline independently. Two signals now agree, severity rises, and the on-call escalation carries the brief with it.
Calibrated to your real history, so the threshold means the same thing for a quiet brand and a loud one.
Severity rises when a second channel agrees, not when one number shouts louder.
Confirmed facts and open questions kept apart, drawn from the real rows behind the spike.
Built from the brief, in the language the story broke in, waiting for a human to approve.
Out-of-hours escalation to a person with a response SLA, available as a retainer.
Every alert keeps its own sequence, so the post-mortem uses evidence rather than memory.
Illustrative numbers. Your workspace runs on your brand's real data from day one.
1 open · own brand
Velocityvs your baseline
Time to alertMedian
Volume against baselineLast 12 hours
What we know
Everything is included. These are the ones this job leans on most, in order.
Every monitoring tool's page is wall-to-wall claims. Here is where the honest line sits.
Volume moving meaningfully past your brand's own baseline on press or social. A social-only spike opens lower and escalates only if sentiment or press confirms it independently.
Yes, as a 24/7 crisis retainer with a response SLA. The platform detects continuously; the retainer puts a person behind the alert out of hours.
Generic alerts use one flat threshold for every brand. Ours learns what normal looks like for yours, and requires corroboration before escalating.